BibTeX doesn't understand lists of names

BibTeX has a strict syntax for lists of authors' (or editors') names in the BibTeX data file; if you write the list of names in a “natural”-seeming way, the chances are you will confuse BibTeX, and the output produced will be quite different from what you had hoped.

Names should be expressed in one of the forms

snippet.latex
First Last
Last, First
Last, Suffix, First

and lists of names should be separated with and. For example: <!– {% raw %} –

>

snippet.latex
AUTHOR = {Fred Q. Bloggs, John P. Doe \&
Another Idiot}

<

!– {% endraw %} –

>

f

alls foul of two of the above rules: a syntactically significant comma appears in an incorrect place, and \& is being used as a name separator. The output of the above might be something like:

snippet.latex
John P. Doe \& Another Idiot Fred Q. Bloggs

because “John P. Doe & Another Idiot has become the “first name”, while “Fred Q. Bloggs” has become the “last name” of a single person. The example should have been written: <!– {% raw %} –

>

snippet.latex
AUTHOR = {Fred Q. Bloggs and John P. Doe and
Another Idiot}

<

!– {% endraw %} –

>

S

ome bibliography styles implement clever acrobatics with very long author lists. You can force truncation by using the pseudo-name others, which will usually translate to something like “et al” in the typeset output. So, if Mr. Bloggs wanted to distract attention from his co-authors, he would write:

snippet.latex
AUTHOR = {Fred Q. Bloggs and others}
This website uses cookies for visitor traffic analysis. By using the website, you agree with storing the cookies on your computer.More information

Creative Commons Lizenzvertrag Edit this page Old revisions Sitemap Backlinks RSS feed Impressum Flattr this